Section 1:
----------

OLD:
   [...]
   filtering aspects of NATs.

   Approaches using directly signaled control of middle boxes such as
   Midcom, UPnP, or in-path signaling are out of scope.

   This document only covers the UDP Unicast aspects of NAT traversal
   and does not cover TCP, IPSEC, or other protocols.  [...]

NEW:
   [...]
   filtering aspects of NATs which may resemble firewall operation.

   Approaches using directly signaled control of middle boxes are out of
   scope.

   This document only covers aspects of NAT traversal related to
   Unicast UDP [1] over IP [2] and their dependencies on other
   protocols.  [...]

Change OLD reference [8] to NEW [10].


Section 2:
----------

OLD references [10], [12], [20], [8],  [17], [15], [18], [15] 
NEW references [12], [14], [22], [10], [19], [17], [20], [17].

OLD:
   [...]
   payload RFC 3027 [10].  [...]

   applications will not be forced to use UDP media relay. [...]
                                              ^^^^^^^

NEW:
   [...]
   payload (see RFC 3027 [12]).   [...]
           ^^^^^             ^
   applications will not be forced to use UDP Relay.
                                              ^

Section 3:
----------

OLD References: [1], [8],  [9],  [13]
NEW References: [3], [10], [11], [15]


Section 4.1, p.7 in REQ-1:
--------------------------

OLD:
      [...]
      met.  Failure to meet REQ-1 will force the use of a Media Relay
                                                          ^^^^^

NEW:
      [...]
      met.  Failure to meet REQ-1 will force the use of a UDP Relay
                                                          ^^^

page 8: Change old Ref [16] to new Ref [18].


Section 4.2, page 10:
---------------------
OLD:
      a) Certain applications expect the source UDP port to be in the
         well-known range.  See RFC 2623 for an example.
NEW:
      a) Certain applications expect the source UDP port to be in the
         well-known range.  See the discussion of Network File System
                                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
         port expectations in RFC 2623 for an example.
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


Section 4.2.2:
--------------

Change OLD refs [14], [16] to NEW refs [16], [18].


Section 4.2.3, second paragraph:
--------------------------------

OLD:
   Furthermore, there is a glaring problem if many applications (or
                           ^^^^^^^^

NEW:
   Furthermore, there is a problem with glare if many applications (or
                                   ^^^^^^^^^^^

Section 4.3, page 12, justification for REQ-6:
----------------------------------------------

OLD:
         [...]
         application to keep [...]

NEW:
         [...]
         external attacker or misbehaving application to keep [...]
         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Section 4.4:
------------

Change OLD Ref [7] to NEW Ref [9].


Section 5, last paragraph:
--------------------------

Change OLD "Media Relay" to NEW "UDP Relay" (2 instances).


Section 6:
----------

Page 16, just before REQ-9:

OLD:
   [...]
   internal or an external source IP address and port. [...]

NEW:
   [...]
   internal (X1:x1) or an external (X1':x1') source IP address and port. [...]
            ^^^^^^^^               ^^^^^^^^^^

Page 17, REQ-10 a):

Change OLD "includes ALGs that affect" to NEW "includes any ALGs that affect".


Section 8:
----------

Change OLD Refs [3], [4] to NEW Refs [5], [6].


Section 10:
-----------

Change OLD Refs [2], [5] to NEW Refs [4], [7].


Section 11, 3rd paragraph:
--------------------------

OLD: [...]   forwarding the individual packets [...]
                                       ^^^^^^^

NEW: [...]   forwarding the individual fragments [...]
                                       ^^^^^^^^^

Section 12:
-----------

Change OLD Ref [18], [2] to NEW Ref [20], [4].

In REQ-10 a), change OLD "includes ALGs that affect" to NEW "includes any ALGs 
that affect".

Section 13:
-----------

Change OLD Refs [11], [6] to NEW Refs [13], [8].


Section 15:
-----------

Change OLD Refs [15], [19], [19] to NEW Refs [17], [21], [21].


Section 16:
-----------

OLD:
   [...]
   Takeda and Paul Hoffman for their contributions.
          ^^^

NEW:
   [...]
   Takeda, Paul Hoffman and Lisa Dusseault for their contributions.
                        ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^


Section 17:
-----------

Change OLD Refs [1]-[20] to NEW Refs [3]-[22].

Add NEW Refs:

   [1]  Postel, J., "User Datagram Protocol", STD 6, RFC 768,
        August 1980.

   [2]  Postel, J., "Internet Protocol", STD 5, RFC 791, September 1981.