\documentclass[helvetica]{seminar} \centerslidesfalse \input{xy} \xyoption{all} \usepackage{graphicx} \usepackage{slidesec} \usepackage{url} \long\def\symbolfootnote[#1]#2{\begingroup% \def\thefootnote{\fnsymbol{footnote}}\footnote[#1]{#2}\endgroup} % to fix problems making landscape seminar pdfs % Letter... \pdfpagewidth=11truein \pdfpageheight=8.5truein \pdfhorigin=1truein % default value(?), but doesn't work without \pdfvorigin=1truein % default value(?), but doesn't work without % A4 %\pdfpagewidth=297truemm % your milage may vary.... %\pdfpageheight=210truemm %\pdfhorigin=1truein % default value(?), but doesn't work without %\pdfvorigin=1truein % default value(?), but doesn't work without \renewcommand{\familydefault}{\sfdefault} \input{seminar.bug} \input{seminar.bg2} % See the Seminar bugs list \slideframe{none} \usepackage{fancyhdr} % Headers and footers personalization using the `fancyhdr' package \fancyhf{} % Clear all fields \renewcommand{\headrulewidth}{0mm} \renewcommand{\footrulewidth}{0.1mm} \fancyfoot[L]{\tiny IETF 73} \fancyfoot[C]{\tiny TLS Extractors} \fancyfoot[R]{\tiny \theslide} % To center horizontally the headers and footers (see seminar.bug) \renewcommand{\headwidth}{\textwidth} % don't center vertically \centerslidesfalse % To adjust the frame length to the header and footer ones \autoslidemarginstrue \pagestyle{fancy} \newcommand{\heading}[1]{% \begin{center} \large\bf #1 \end{center} \vspace{.4 in}} \begin{document} \begin{slide} \begin{center} \LARGE{{\bf}TLS Extractor Status}\\ \vspace{.3 in} \large{Eric Rescorla}\\ \large{RTFM, Inc.}\\ \large{\texttt{ekr@networkresonance.com}} \end{center} \end{slide} \begin{slide} \heading{Document Currently in Last Call} \begin{itemize} \item Last call ends Dec 4, 2008 \item Comments from Pasi Eronen, Alfred H\"{i}nes, Hugo Krawczyk \item Mostly editorial \item One typo in the definition of \textsf{context\_value} \item Terminology issue from Hugo \end{itemize} \end{slide} \begin{slide} \heading{Terminology Issue} \footnotesize{ \begin{verbatim} I have a single "objection" to this document, namely, the use of the word "extractor". Let me explain. In the context of key derivation functions the notion of extraction refers to a first phase where one starts with a somewhat weak source of randomness (such as an imperfect RNG, a Diffie-Hellman value, etc) and extracts a first cryptographically strong key K. In a second phase, often called key expansion, one derives multiple keys out of this K using a PRF exactly as the current document specifies. Since master_secret is assumed to already be a cryptographically strong key, then this specification is sound and correct (especially that it includes the essential context information). \end{verbatim} } \end{slide} \begin{slide} \heading{Proposed New Names} \begin{itemize} \item Exporter \item Deriver \item Your name here \end{itemize} \end{slide} \end{document}